In this edition…

• No patent infringement where a product is modified for re-use
• Biometric Data and Privacy: Managing third party providers
• Katie v Katy: A rose by any other name

In this edition…

• CSIRO developing technologies and solutions in response to COVID-19
• Ferrari takes its 488 Pista Spider design to a hearing and prevails
• Commissioner of Patents v Rokt Pte Ltd

In this edition…

• Proposed Australian Designs reform: Grace period HOT but GUI’s NOT
• Congratulations to our new Principals
• No compensation for the Commonwealth: Australia v Sanofi

In this edition…

• COVID-19: An update from Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
• WIPO releases draft issues paper on IP policy for AI inventions
• Much needed clarification on allowability of amendments post Raising the Bar

In this edition…

• Trade mark registration stacks up for JB Hi-Fi
• Australian Innovation Patents likely to be abolished
• Encompass Corporation v InfoTrack - Our full analysis

In this edition…

• Indigenous art knock-offs result in $2.3 million fine
• Australia not in Harmony with the US on Diagnostic Patents
• Patentable Subject Matter: Second Bite of the Apple® Sweeter than a Cripps Pink®

In this edition…

• Getting the most out of your IP: Questions from start-ups
• Unjustified threats riskier than ever
• POF takes home 'Firm of the Year' award for Trade Mark Prosecution